Reference · 17 Jurisdictions

Global Breach Notification Matrix

A side-by-side reference for security and privacy leaders managing multi-jurisdiction incidents. Includes regulator clocks, individual-notification expectations, and the triggers that start them.

Reference only — confirm specifics with counsel before relying on any clock. Regulations evolve.

JurisdictionRegulatorRegulator clockIndividual clockTrigger
European Union (GDPR)Lead supervisory authority≤ 72 hours after becoming awareWithout undue delay if high riskPersonal data breach (confidentiality, integrity, or availability).
United Kingdom (UK GDPR / DPA 2018)Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)≤ 72 hours after awarenessWithout undue delay if high riskPersonal data breach as defined under UK GDPR.
European Union (NIS2 — essential/important entities)National CSIRT / competent authorityEarly warning ≤ 24h · update ≤ 72h · report ≤ 1 monthInform recipients of services if appropriateSignificant incident affecting service provision.
European Union (DORA — financial entities)Competent financial authorityInitial, intermediate, and final reports per RTSInform clients when materially affectedMajor ICT-related incident under DORA classification.
United States — HIPAA (PHI)HHS Office for Civil Rights≤ 60 days (≥ 500 individuals) · annually for < 500≤ 60 days from discoveryBreach of unsecured Protected Health Information.
United States — State laws (CCPA/CPRA and 49 others)State attorneys general (varies)Many require AG notice (often ≤ 30–60 days)Without unreasonable delay; many ≤ 30–60 daysAcquisition of unencrypted personal information.
United States — SEC (public companies)U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionForm 8-K Item 1.05: ≤ 4 business days of materiality determinationPublic disclosureMaterial cybersecurity incident.
Canada (PIPEDA)Office of the Privacy CommissionerAs soon as feasible after determining real risk of significant harmAs soon as feasibleBreach of security safeguards with real risk of significant harm.
Brazil (LGPD)Autoridade Nacional de Proteção de Dados (ANPD)Within a reasonable period (ANPD guidance: ≤ 3 business days)Within reasonable periodIncident that may cause relevant risk or damage to data subjects.
Australia (Privacy Act — NDB scheme)Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC)As soon as practicable after assessment (assessment ≤ 30 days)As soon as practicableEligible data breach likely to result in serious harm.
Singapore (PDPA)Personal Data Protection Commission (PDPC)≤ 72 hours after assessing as notifiableOn or after notification to PDPC, where significant harm is likelySignificant scale (≥ 500 individuals) or significant harm.
Japan (APPI)Personal Information Protection Commission (PPC)Preliminary ≤ ~3–5 days · final ≤ 30 / 60 daysPromptly to affected individualsLeak/loss of sensitive data, > 1,000 individuals, or unlawful purpose.
South Africa (POPIA)Information RegulatorAs soon as reasonably possible after discoveryAs soon as reasonably possibleReasonable grounds to believe personal information was accessed/acquired by an unauthorized person.
Nigeria (NDPR / NDPA)Nigeria Data Protection Commission (NDPC)≤ 72 hours after becoming aware (or as soon as reasonably practicable)Without undue delay where high risk to rights and freedomsPersonal data breach likely to result in high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects.
Kenya (Data Protection Act 2019)Office of the Data Protection Commissioner (ODPC)≤ 72 hours after becoming aware (or as soon as reasonably practicable)Without undue delay where high risk to rights and freedomsPersonal data breach likely to result in high risk to the rights and freedoms of data subjects.
Ghana (Data Protection Act 2012)Data Protection Commission (DPC Ghana)As soon as reasonably practicable after discoveryAs soon as reasonably practicable where harm is likelyUnauthorized access, acquisition, or disclosure of personal data.
UAE (PDPL)UAE Data OfficeWithout undue delay per executive regulationsWhen breach may cause direct prejudice to rights/privacyPersonal data breach affecting privacy, confidentiality, or security.

Need a multi-jurisdiction IR playbook?

Dephiant designs notification workflows that pre-stage decisions across regulators, customers, and partners — so the right clocks start at the right moment, with the right approvals.